Saturday 8 November 2014

Weekly Report & Reflection Post 8



Wikipedia, 2014
This week we looked at wikis, I tool that I am sure almost everyone is familiar with. However if you have never heard of a wiki do not worry, the concept is actually pretty simple. A wiki is just a site that lets users edit documents collaboratively. Wikis pose a number of benefits in education however they often tend to get a bad name. I am sure in high school, and throughout university everyone has heard their teacher or professor say “I better not see Wikipedia on in your resources”. As soon as you hear this you think “oh these wikis must provide false information”. This is not true at all, and they can actually be quite useful when doing research. Wikipedia which is one of the words largest Wiki, provides easy to find, and understand information that is quite valid. Many people in the community work to make sure this information is true, and free of profanities. Wikipedia can actually be a great place to look when doing a research assignment, because although you may not be able to cite it directly, like other curation sites there are a number of links to scholarly articles which support what is being said on the wiki page. For more information on using Wikis in education check out "It’s a wiki wiki world” and when reading wikis always keep in mind anyone can edit a wiki, regardless of their level of knowledge on the topic. 

      Wikis can be helpful as a quick way to learn about a topic, or find out where other people are getting information but they can also be extremely useful as a collaboration tool. I have the most experience using wikis for this reason. Prior to knowing about Google Docs when I was part of a group project wikis would be used quite frequently. Wikis often took off the pressure or stress I associate with group projects because each member could work on the project when they had time, there is not physical meeting needed when using a wiki. A side from making working together easier it also helps de-clutter and organize everyone’s information as mention in the video “Wikis in plain English”. From my experience wikis are much more effective than email. This is because with the wiki everyone can see when changes are made, but with email the changes are not seen until you send the email back to your group. Nothing in my opinion is worse than when you spend a few hours working on a section of a paper, and then forget to send it to your group and you find out they were working on the same thing. The wiki eliminates this issue though because you can see every change that is made right away. 

uwstoutinnovations(CC) 2014
As I mentioned earlier, although wikis are a great tool I much prefer to use Google Docs. As we learned last week Google Docs works similar to a wiki, but has a few features I prefer. I really like the comments tool on Google Docs and I like how you can chose different types of documents, such as word, slideshows, and spreadsheets. Wikis also limit the amount of editors to one at a time, where on Google Docs everyone can be working on a part at the same time and see changes as they are being made. Lastly Google Docs are much more private and allows users to limit who can access and view their document, unlike wikis which allow any user to edit the document. I know it can get pretty confusing when trying to choose which platform you should use, is a blog, wiki or Google Docs best for what you are trying to do? Each person has their own preference but if you are interested in learning the key differences between the three you can click here for a great chart that helps clear things up! :)
 
On my Feedly reader I subscribe to numerous newspaper websites around the world, one being the Sydney Morning Herald (I really want to move to Australia haha). A few weeks ago an article came up titled “Wikipedia 'edit-a-thon' writes women into history” and although the article was interesting, they made a claim in it that less than 13% of contributors on Wikipedia are female. This led me to do some research, and brought me to the article I have chosen to share this week, a New York Times article titled “Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia’s Contributor List”. Click here for the full article. 

Thanks for reading,
Olivia

No comments:

Post a Comment